<charlie griefer>

*tap*tap*tap* is this thing on?

going OO with a little help from my friends

june 18, 2008 at 4:27pm in ColdFusion, going OO, frameworks

so remember a few months back when i was all like, "i'm going OO, and i'm going to document my progress so maybe other folks will learn what i'm learning"? yeah, that didn't go so well. for me, my OO journey has been decidedly hit-and-miss (more miss than hit, unfortunately). i think my attempt to document that journey reflected that.

for me, i think the issue is that i wasn't working in OO day-to-day. i'd learn how to do something, but then i'd get confused as to what the next logical step should be. or, i'd talk to somebody who would suggest that what i had learned wasn't necessarily how they would do it, and i'd step back. what i really needed was a mentor. one person that i had access to during the course of the day, that i could bounce ideas off of. one person that could show me *their* way (regardless of whether or not it was how others did it), and i could journey down that particular road. later on, i'd hope to have enough of a conceptual grasp that i'd be able to say, "wait... what about doing it *this* way?".

i may finally be in that situation. jon messer recently joined us at amcom. jon's somewhat of an OO god, altho he'll try and tell you otherwise (and he'll be terribly embarrassed at reading this ). in the few months that jon's been here, working with him has been a privilege, and one for which i'm very grateful.

now, this is more than just a "neener-neener-neener-i-have-a-mentor-and-you-don't" post. jon's very much into helping others learn, and has started a series of his own blog posts in which he's going to attempt to demystify the concepts of building OO applications. i think this series is largely going to be what i was previously attempting, with the significant difference that jon's already at a point where he can teach what he knows (as opposed to trying to teach what he's learning).

the series comes out of an evaluation that he had done of some of the coldfusion MVC frameworks, and deconstructs the code that he used.

this promises to be an interesting and educational series. i'd highly suggest that if you're still making the transition from procedural to OO, you sit in. feel free to post questions, or just a comment to let him know what you think about his approach.

transfer: first impressions

april 2, 2008 at 8:32pm in transfer, frameworks

last night i downloaded and looked at transfer, a coldfusion based ORM, for the first time. to be clear, it's the first time i've looked at any ORM. i'm more than a little unhappy. what the hell is wrong with me that i've never made an effort to use transfer before? (that's a rhetorical question. there's not enough gigs of storage space on the internet to answer. k thx).

how did this all finally come about? i'm working on a project that's my first model-glue app that actually makes use of objects. i was told to use transfer by more than a few people, but i didn't want to add any more to the learning curve. it seemed to me that learning model-glue, coldspring, and OO was quite enough for my little brain.

a model-glue gotcha

january 2, 2008 at 6:48pm in model-glue, frameworks

i can't imagine this isn't a fairly well known "issue" in the model-glue community, but what with being new to model-glue, this was a new issue for me.  i figure it's worth mentioning, if only to save somebody else the several billion hours of debugging that i lost this afternoon.

let me point out first that this isn't a model-glue issue per se. it's a combination of using model-glue with coldfusion debugging and some javascript thrown in for good measure (some of you may already know where i'm going with this).

the art of being right (learning OO)

december 7, 2007 at 9:00am in model-glue, ColdFusion, going OO, frameworks

hey all. i'm back, and i'd like to officially apologize for going all bermuda triangle on you in the middle of the "going OO" series. i'd like to take a few minutes and reflect on some of what happened, because some of it is actually relevant.

first... the non-relevant bits. we moved (again). i thought it would be a fairly easy thing to do this time around... because unlike the last 2 times it wasn't an across country move (from AZ to FL and then from FL to CA). this time it was from CA (southern) to CA (east bay)... but it still really really sucked. it was just a very draining experience (both physically and mentally) and I never ever want to do it again (but i will).

factor in starting the new job (which is going great so far, thankyouverymuch) and i just haven't even had time to keep up with reading blogs, let alone writing an entry.

but things have settled down (somewhat) so i'm going to try and get back into the swing of things.

So the $64,000 question is... where'm i at with all of this OO stuff? hell of a question. sorta wish you hadn't asked. >sigh< but you did, so...



 
© 1980-2008, charlie griefer - design based on *Limelight* by www.mitchinson.net
blogCFC was created by raymond camden. this blog is running version 5.9.002.

CSS | XHTML