google's chrome... it doesn't suck
september 2, 2008 at 1:25pm
in general
the blogosphere and twitter are both ablaze today with talk of google's foray into the browser market with chrome. my first impressions, and some accompanying screenshots...
up until it was actually available, i'd not been following the story too much, so i hadn't seen screenshots or read about any specific features. my first impression upon loading it up was, "wow... there's like... no chrome". i haven't messed around yet with configuration options, but there's no status bar. no toolbar. it's literally just an address bar (which seems to also serve as an integrated search bar), and tabs. it's minimalistic in it's look, as is standard with most things google, but i like it. it's uncluttered, but i'm not sure the general public will see it as such. the plain design that i see as a plus could easily be seen as... well, plain.
which raises an interesting point. i'm not sure what market google is after. are they trying to be a mainstream browser and compete directly with IE and firefox? i don't know that i see that happening. but given some of the features that they've implemented, i definitely see them competing for the affections of techie geeks.
most web developers that i know generally use firefox for testing during development. why? the firebug plugin. this plugin is far and away one of the most useful tools ever created for debugging a web page's display and behavior in a browser window. out of the box, chrome provides a tool that will allow you to introspect any page element, and its functionality certainly rivals firebug's... as far as CSS goes. as far as i can tell, there is not (yet) any functionality to debug scripts or to monitor network traffic (useful for debugging AJAX calls). still, for core functionality, it's very slick for what it does.
in further appealing to the geek, right-clicking above the address bar brings up a "task manager" window. the window shows you how many tabs you've got open, as well as what resources (memory, CPU, network) each tab is utilizing. should you run into any issues with a particular tab, you can end that specific process. i haven't had the opportunity to test that yet, but if it works, that'd be a pleasant change from firefox, which generally crashes as an application if a single tab locks up. to further support my theory that google is targeting the geek audience, the task manager window contains a link entitled "Stats for nerds", which displays some fairly detailed data about the browser's memory usage.
overall web pages seemed to load noticeably faster than in other browsers. of course, gmail seems to work a treat, which is nice as i'd sort of gotten used to gmail crashing firefox (to be fair, this hasn't happened in firefox since the latest update. w00t!). i haven't done extensive testing, but some cursory browsing seems to indicate that both javascript and css look as i'd expect them to look.
bottom line is... i like it. i actually like it a lot. it's sleek, it's fast, and it's got some nice built-in tools to satisfy your inner geek. have you tried it? i know that a lot of folks seem to be hesitant, taking this as a sign of google's further intent to dominate all things web (which is not inherently a bad thing folks, if they do it right and continue to not be evil), but i think it's certainly worthwhile to give it a glance and judge it based on its own merits, rather than only a perception of the company that provides it.
*update* it was just brought to my attention that CTRL-SHIFT-N will launch the browser in "incognito mode". and yes, i can think of a situation or two where that could come in handy 
click on the thumbnails below to embiggen 'em:
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |



# Sep 2, 2008 @ 11:52 PM
The installer is insulting with nearly no options whatsoever.
The minimalistic look is annoying. I'd like all windows to be the same, not have to remember the specialities of each program. Come on, at least give me a proper title bar! If it's for geeks, it should be ergonomic.
What is nice is the spell checker. Actually, no it isn't. Ironically, it marks Google wrong, as I'm writing this comment. Maybe because of the German settings it's forced on me because I live there. Chrome doesn't care if I don't want it and won't let me change it.
Scrolling is generally bad, especially in text boxes. very jumpy. And yeah, the spell checker doesn't work if the page is scrolled.
I can't agree that Google haven't got a clearly defined target audience. Chrome doesn't have enough options to pull users away from Firefox, and I'm unsure Opera users will see the point in changing. So it's got to be IE users.
I say this because I get the idea it's idiot-proof. You can't do much wrong, even if you tinker with the options. Side effect is that you can't do much with it either.
As an advanced user, it makes me feel like Google don't trust me with even slightly complicated features and options. Disappointing.
I fail to see the appeal, unless Chrome is the most web-standard browser... we shall see.
# Sep 3, 2008 @ 1:15 AM
# Sep 3, 2008 @ 6:28 AM
That's one of Google's key features, minimalism.
Scrolling isn't great - but at least the textboxes are expandable to reduce that problem.
The spell checker (or more specifically, not being able to disable it, nor add words to the dictionary) is very irritating - hadn't noticed it until now.
However, this is a very early development release - they're throwing it out into the wild exactly in order to gather feedback, so go give them feedback!
>> unless Chrome is the most web-standard browser
It is. It uses WebKit, which was the first to pass Acid2 and currently the only one to pass Acid3...
# Sep 3, 2008 @ 7:42 AM
Thanks for clearing that up about the web-standards. Also, I'm not against minimalism, I just want a normal window.
I like the sandboxed tabs very much, it's just that I'm not sure why Google are bothering or think they need to. Plus, Google support Firefox (and say they will continue to do so), so why not help develop that?
# Sep 3, 2008 @ 10:49 AM
I usually go for new windows rather than new tabs, but with Chrome I've already been doing tabs much more frequently...
I suspect part of the reasoning is that Firefox's code/structure is so bad, that for Google to implement the features they want it is easier to start from scratch.
Since all this is being released under the modified BSD license, the Mozilla/Firefox teams can easily pick out any parts they like and use them, so in many ways this isn't really competing with Firefox.
Also, Google have specifically invited that by making the V8 JavaScript engine independent from the browser.
And just a final point on the "why bother" front - despite being out for many years, Firefox/Opera/etc haven't really had much of an impact on IE being *the* browser (especially not when you exclude developers/etc).
Google could, with the right marketing/etc, potentially convert "normal" people away from IE, and that can only be a good thing. :)
# Sep 4, 2008 @ 9:09 AM
Since Google Chrome documentation about debuging is still to come and Google Chome doesn’t have a Firebug extension, I just wrote a short article explaining how to use the different tools “for developers” available in Google Chrome.
Please take a look at the article (Pictures are self explanatory, but text is in Spanish)
“Depurar Aplicaciones y Páginas Web con Google Chrome”
http://www.tecsisa.com/index.igw?item=1608
I would be glad to add, edit or do changes as information arrives, so feel free to give feedback.
Javier